Of course fixing ABCL such that it allows + in ASDF names would probably be a good thing.
On Oct 7, 2010, at 12:38 PM, mahmud wrote:
On 10/7/2010 12:44 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote: A trivial rename of the .asd file (and the contained system) to, say, clssl, allows ABCL to get past this, so it looks like the + in the file name (or ASDF system name) is causing the problem.
Of course the trivial fix doesn't really fix things as there's still a CFFI problem, but that's for another email....
Cyrus,
I myself need cl+ssl for our project and was thinking of wrapping the CFFI calls to openssl with a layer that calls java crypto APIs instead.
There is more to do, but I can give that particular problem some attention, mostly because we need it for work.
Regards.
- mahmud
armedbear-devel mailing list armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel