6 Nov
2009
6 Nov
'09
4:12 p.m.
2009/11/6 Matthew D. Swank akopa@charter.net:
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen@gmail.com wrote:
I don't believe we want to convert lisp code to java code in the future. The ongoing desire is to have less java and more lisp.
Yes. Certainly less Java would make it easier to eventually target .NET (w/o using ikvm): another improvement in the list.
Parrot and native code are also on my (very) long-term list. ;)