On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
Kind of curious: Why are you not just using the jsint implementation?
Well, one reason being that their implemetation requires a call to setAccessible() which is defined to be allowed to raise a security exception. The method Alessio implemented (and I figured out long ago in order to implement USOCKET on ABCL) doesn't have that drawback. When this strategy can't work, well, I guess we'll need to revisit and go the security exception route.
If it happens to raise a security exception, one can deal with it then. I've used the jsint implementation for a long time now and I don't recall that happening once.
It's been in use for quite a while and it would certainly make my life easier to be able to continue to use that interface. For example, I use their findMethod implementation to get a method so I can optimize certain loops by avoiding dynamic lookup each time.
Right. We want to start doing caching like that too, based on the object class, method name and the argument classes. That would be what you need, right?
Yes. However I am concerned that this is work that need not be done, freeing up time to do other things. The jsint implementation does what is necessary and is the product of a good deal of thought and experience. Seems to me that using mature code is preferable to re-implementing stuff.
Regards, Alan
(and thanks for your efforts, in any case!)