21 May
2010
21 May
'10
9:57 a.m.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
So, the conclusion must be that our fasl reader is great, to the extent that it allows human-readable fasls, but it brings us the negative side effect that we start up too slow to be useable on - for example - Google App Engine.
Oh, really? Bugger. I was hoping to get to that (ABCL + GAE) later in the year, but I haven't had time to explore it much. Are there many other people interested in this use case? I'd be keen to hear how others have got on with this (i.e. is there anyone who hasn't given up 'cause it's too slow). How does ABCL compare with Clojure in this regard (speed of initial start-up)?
Thanks, and keep up all the great work,
John :^P -- john@synchromesh.com