http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14756 fixes the cl-cont problems. After providing enough PermGen memory, I got the other failures to complete correctly (including stmx, btw) now too.
Could you run the tests again to see if *now* there are new successes? (I'm still expecting new successes, but I can't remember which systems were failing that were reporting eliminated dead code in LABELS.)
Regards,
Erik.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. I understand the problem now. This is indeed caused by my commit, however, the old code had a similar problem -- not with LABELS, but with FLET, which apparently nobody ever ran into yet: There's a problem in the order of macro-expansion versus binding the local functions to shadow macros in the lexical environment.
Working on a fix now.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
Ah. This is probably the compiled version which fails. The interpreted version is the one I ran.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
Reproduce it like this:
(ql:quickload :cl-cont-test) (let ((rtest::*compile-tests* t)) (rtest:do-tests))
The RT test framework has two modes, rtest::*compile-tests* == t and nil. cl-test-grid runs both modes.
Did the cl-cont tests run in their own ABCL instance?
Yes, separate ABCL process.
Best regards,
- Anton
09.04.2015, 21:55, "Erik Huelsmann" ehuels@gmail.com:
Hi Anton,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru
wrote:
07.04.2015, 01:07, "Erik Huelsmann" ehuels@gmail.com:
Bummer that the change causes regressions and no improvements.
Note, we don't know exactly what of the changes between release 1.3.1
and the current dev version
causes the regressions, it's not necessary the last commit.
Sure. That's no problem. However, I'm not understanding something: I
tested the cl-cont LABELS-2 and -3 failures. On my own system they didn't fail. Is there something in the tester environment that could make it fail? Did the cl-cont tests run in their own ABCL instance? Or did they run after lots of other test in the same instance?
Regards,
-- Bye,
Erik.
http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
-- Bye,
Erik.
http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
-- Bye,
Erik.
http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.