18 Oct
2009
18 Oct
'09
5:35 p.m.
2009/10/18 Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com>:
The ConditionThrowable should probably be named TransferOfControl instead, is what I'm now thinking. That would add to the "self-explanatory" level in the sources, I'd say.
For the superclass of GO/RETURN/etc. yes, but I don't think we should get rid of ConditionThrowable. ConditionThrowable is actually not a good superclass for GO/RETURN/etc., because I'd expect Java code to try and catch conditions, but such catches should IMO not be mixed with catching GO/etc. To me it looks like we need two superclasses, ConditionThrowable for conditions, TransferOfControl for others.