On 10/31/10 9:58 AM, Faré wrote:
On 31 October 2010 01:46, Mark Evensonevenson@panix.com wrote:
ABCL trunk upgraded to ASDF-2.010.1 in [r12986][1].
Thanks a lot!
BTW, in the new numbering scheme I just inaugurated, 2.010 is stable, and 2.010.1 is a development version. In this case, 2.010.1 includes a GCL-specific patch, which won't affect you. I would recommend that in general, you should include a 2.0xx version in your official releases, not a 2.0xx.y version, unless the development version includes some ABCL-specific fix. This will help keep things more stable and restrict the number of different versions of ASDF found in the wild.
No need to downgrade to 2.010, though. Just keep that in mind next time you upgrade.
Or maybe you think this is a bad move, and have better ideas as to how ASDF versions may be numbered.
Thanks for the heads up on the versioning change. I must confess that I don't understand git very well, being more of a Mercurial partisan, so I had just issued
unix$ git fetch origin unix$ git pull
which had worked before to follow the stable branch of ASDF.
I don't expect that you are mixing development on the stable branch, so I'll have to poke around the git documentation to figure out what I am doing wrong.