Agreed: fixing STD-FIND-METHOD-COMBINATION seems to be necessary.
@anton: thanks for the tests
@rudi: dunno if this is you, but could you take a look to see if this is easy? If you fix on trunk, I will take care of the release.
At this point, I would release abcl-1.2.1 and announce, as abcl-1.2.0 has already been "softly launched" without announcement.
-- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad idea? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in email?
On Jun 9, 2013, at 1:15, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
08.06.2013, 02:35, "Anton Vodonosov" avodonosov@yandex.ru:
08.06.2013, 02:13, "Erik Huelsmann" ehuels@gmail.com:
Hi Anton, Could you test ABCL-1.2.0-RC with the latest Quicklisp snapshot and publish reports? I'd love to see how we're doing in the CL ecosystem before we release!
Thanks!
Bye,
Erik.
Hello, Erik.
Just today I started the tests, on the 1.2.0 source tarball from abcl.org and on the current svn head. They are running on your VM. The results will be a day or two later.
Best regards,
- Anton
Hello again.
The results for ABCL 1.2.0 RC (the soruce tarball form abcl.org) are ready. Comparision with ABCL 1.1.1: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff10.html
As you see there are some regressions - results that were green and have become red. Most of the seem to be caused by the same error: Wrong number of arguments for #<STD-FIND-METHOD-COMBINATION {17D2F0E}>.
Best regards,
- Anton