21 May
2010
21 May
'10
10:35 a.m.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2010 12:42, Alessio Stalla alessiostalla@gmail.com wrote:
Would that preclude having unicode string constants?
We could encode Unicode strings in ASCII, escaping non-ASCII characters some way. What could be more problematic is symbols with
How's that any faster than doing the utf-8 conversion as we do now? The "escaping non-ASCII characters" thingy has a name, it's called.. *drumroll*.. utf-8. :)
Ok, but we could do it only for those strings that we know to contain non-ASCII characters, and not for the whole FASL.