Hi, I've been trying to improve my idea in [1]. Attached is a slightly different patch, still with the same general idea though. I've added two tests, however I'd still like to do a bit more than that, especially testing the correct resolution of methods, i.e. Java::isMoreSpecialized. My current understanding is that with this patch all possible methods (like for the attached class DummyMethods) are found, but that isMoreSpecialized doesn't actually do what its name implies, namely finding the most specialized method. That is, I'm assuming that JCALL is supposed to use the (exact) same kind of method resolution as Java (if no method signature is given)? Additionally I actually wanted to add DummyMethods for testing from java-tests.lisp, but didn't work out for now. Best regards, Olof [1]: http://abcl.org/trac/ticket/352 _______________________________________________ Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel