[armedbear-devel] Incomplete file lisp/digest.lisp in r14198
Hi, File src/org/armedbear/lisp/digest.lisp in current SVN contains an incomplete function named SHA256 (unbalanced parentheses). -- Eric Marsden
On Oct 14, 2012, at 20:12, Eric Marsden <eric.marsden@free.fr> wrote:
Hi,
File src/org/armedbear/lisp/digest.lisp in current SVN contains an incomplete function named SHA256 (unbalanced parentheses).
Thanks, I brutalized the function into compiling without warnings. Obviously, the string branch line in the typecase form was killed - didn't want to guess what the code had been there, so I inserted a shouty error form instead. Rudi
On 10/14/12 8:46 PM, Rudolf Schlatte wrote:
On Oct 14, 2012, at 20:12, Eric Marsden <eric.marsden@free.fr> wrote:
Hi,
File src/org/armedbear/lisp/digest.lisp in current SVN contains an incomplete function named SHA256 (unbalanced parentheses).
Thanks, I brutalized the function into compiling without warnings. Obviously, the string branch line in the typecase form was killed - didn't want to guess what the code had been there, so I inserted a shouty error form instead.
Thanks for fixing. Apparently my mq got out of control yesterday, leading me to flush my (rather thin!) snapshot of changes for abcl-1.1.0. Something about not really being in my right mind due to a bad head cold. About to branch a abcl-1.1.0 (20120515a) that should be stabilized for the release. All [features][] should be working on trunk. CLOSER-MOP still needs to be patched. CFFI seems to work. Quicklisp rocks. [features]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.armedbear.devel/2574 Mark <evenson@panix.com> -- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now."
On Oct 15, 2012, at 06:21, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
About to branch a abcl-1.1.0 (20120515a) that should be stabilized for the release.
All [features][] should be working on trunk.
CLOSER-MOP still needs to be patched.
Pascal Costanza is working on this (see http://p-cos.blogspot.no/2012/09/closer-to-mop-on-abcl-and-ecl.html), and has been reporting some quite involved bugs which have been fixed. I think having a released version of abcl with mop support will make it easier to release a new version of closer-mop as well ("works with abcl >= 1.1" instead of "please download a svn version of abcl and compile it yourself"), so we need not wait for closer-mop. Pascal, are there any outstanding bugs you need fixed?
CFFI seems to work.
Cool, I hadn't thought running CFFI from the JVM was possible. Rudi
Hi, I am currently in the middle of a move, so I don't have time to work on this, unfortunately. I will be able to continue again from the end of the month on. Best, Pascal On 15 Oct 2012, at 09:44, Rudolf Schlatte <rudi@constantly.at> wrote:
On Oct 15, 2012, at 06:21, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
About to branch a abcl-1.1.0 (20120515a) that should be stabilized for the release.
All [features][] should be working on trunk.
CLOSER-MOP still needs to be patched.
Pascal Costanza is working on this (see http://p-cos.blogspot.no/2012/09/closer-to-mop-on-abcl-and-ecl.html), and has been reporting some quite involved bugs which have been fixed. I think having a released version of abcl with mop support will make it easier to release a new version of closer-mop as well ("works with abcl >= 1.1" instead of "please download a svn version of abcl and compile it yourself"), so we need not wait for closer-mop.
Pascal, are there any outstanding bugs you need fixed?
CFFI seems to work.
Cool, I hadn't thought running CFFI from the JVM was possible.
Rudi
-- Pascal Costanza
Any hope of this being part of 1.1? On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net> wrote:
Hi,
I am currently in the middle of a move, so I don't have time to work on this, unfortunately. I will be able to continue again from the end of the month on.
Best, Pascal
On 15 Oct 2012, at 09:44, Rudolf Schlatte <rudi@constantly.at> wrote:
On Oct 15, 2012, at 06:21, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
About to branch a abcl-1.1.0 (20120515a) that should be stabilized for
the release.
All [features][] should be working on trunk.
CLOSER-MOP still needs to be patched.
Pascal Costanza is working on this (see http://p-cos.blogspot.no/2012/09/closer-to-mop-on-abcl-and-ecl.html), and has been reporting some quite involved bugs which have been fixed. I think having a released version of abcl with mop support will make it easier to release a new version of closer-mop as well ("works with abcl >= 1.1" instead of "please download a svn version of abcl and compile it yourself"), so we need not wait for closer-mop.
Pascal, are there any outstanding bugs you need fixed?
CFFI seems to work.
Cool, I hadn't thought running CFFI from the JVM was possible.
Rudi
-- Pascal Costanza
_______________________________________________ armedbear-devel mailing list armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel
On Dec 1, 2012, at 11:52, Blake McBride <blake@mcbride.name> wrote:
Any hope of this being part of 1.1?
("this" being closer-mop, presumably) abcl 1.1 will release with a full mop as per AMOP. Presumably, the next release of closer-mop will support abcl. Since the projects are separate and independent, neither of them blocks the other in their release plans - the earlier emails between Pascal and me were just to verify that there are no reported-but-unfixed bugs remaining in abcl. Does this answer your question? Rudi
On 15 Oct 2012, at 09:44, Rudolf Schlatte <rudi@constantly.at> wrote:
On Oct 15, 2012, at 06:21, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
About to branch a abcl-1.1.0 (20120515a) that should be stabilized for the release.
All [features][] should be working on trunk.
CLOSER-MOP still needs to be patched.
Pascal Costanza is working on this (see http://p-cos.blogspot.no/2012/09/closer-to-mop-on-abcl-and-ecl.html), and has been reporting some quite involved bugs which have been fixed. I think having a released version of abcl with mop support will make it easier to release a new version of closer-mop as well ("works with abcl >= 1.1" instead of "please download a svn version of abcl and compile it yourself"), so we need not wait for closer-mop.
Pascal, are there any outstanding bugs you need fixed?
Yes, there are outstanding bugs. Sorry for the long break, but I have moved from Brussels to Leuven which took a considerable amount of time, among other things. Now back to bug reports. ;) I will send them in separate emails, so it's not messing up existing threads… Pascal -- Pascal Costanza
participants (5)
-
Blake McBride -
Eric Marsden -
Mark Evenson -
Pascal Costanza -
Rudolf Schlatte