On behalf of the developers of ABCL (Armed Bear Common Lisp) I'm glad to be able to announce the 1.0.1 release.
ABCL is a Common Lisp implementation implemented in Java and running on the JVM, featuring both an interpreter and a compiler. The compiler targets the JVM directly meaning that its output is runnable JVM bytecode. The fact that ABCL is written in Java allows for relatively easy embedding in larger applications. For integration with existing applications ABCL implements Java Specification Request (JSR) 223: Java scripting API.
This release squashes bugs in the ABCL 1.0 release, most notably it features a working ABCL-CONTRIB symbol to the ANSI REQUIRE mechanism and it ships with ASDF 2.019.
You can find more in the release notes at:
http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear/release-notes-1.0.1.shtml
and the list of changes at:
http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/browser/tags/1.0.1/abcl/CHANGES
Source and binary distribution archives with associated cryptographic signatures can be downloaded in ZIP or gzipped tar from:
http://common.lisp.net/project/armedbear/releases/1.0.1
If you have questions regarding use or licensing, or you find issues, please report back to the development list:
armedbear-devel at common-lisp dot net
On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:28 AM, Mark Evenson wrote:
[…]
Source and binary distribution archives with associated cryptographic signatures can be downloaded in ZIP or gzipped tar from:
http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear/releases/1.0.1
And of course from the homepage
I just tried it and noticed one strange thing.
(asdf::implementation-identifier) returns abcl-1.0.1-svn-13750-13751-fasl38-solaris-x86 now.
Why solaris? (I am on windows).
In the release 1.0.0 it was abcl-1.0.0-svn-13663-fasl38-win-x86.
I am curious why OS identifier is used here (takning into account that ABCL is java based and should work equally on any OS)?
Best regards, - Anton
On Jan 11, 2012, at 05:34 , Anton Vodonosov wrote:
I just tried it and noticed one strange thing.
(asdf::implementation-identifier) returns abcl-1.0.1-svn-13750-13751-fasl38-solaris-x86 now.
Why solaris? (I am on windows).
In the release 1.0.0 it was abcl-1.0.0-svn-13663-fasl38-win-x86.
I am curious why OS identifier is used here (takning into account that ABCL is java based and should work equally on any OS)?
Best regards,
- Anton
armedbear-devel mailing list armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel
Filed as [ticket #192][]. Thanks for the sharp eyes!
armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net