[armedbear-devel] Bug: COND clauses must have a test
8 Apr
2015
8 Apr
'15
8:57 p.m.
The syntax for COND is: cond {clause}* => result* clause::= (test-form form*) therefore (cond ()) should be a program-error, but abcl 1.0.1 returns NIL. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
8 Apr
8 Apr
8:57 p.m.
On Nov 24, 2013, at 15:03, Pascal J. Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
The syntax for COND is:
cond {clause}* => result* clause::= (test-form form*)
therefore (cond ()) should be a program-error, but abcl 1.0.1 returns NIL.
Erik addressed this in [r14588][]. [r14588]: http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14588 -- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is nothing to compare to it now."
3737
Age (days ago)
3737
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Mark Evenson -
Pascal J. Bourguignon