#218: More Compreshensive Regression testing ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Reporter: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=aitoawmy4u2arai5whm4pn4h0biwcvdnd33... | Owner: ehuelsmann Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: 2.0 Component: interpreter | Version: 1.1.0-dev Keywords: | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Comment(by https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=aitoawmy4u2arai5whm4pn4h0biwcvdnd33...): easye: A command-line switch? Perhaps, yes. That would make the current implementation easier to test w/o messing with the current ways of building. Simply, the switch would tell ABCL to ignore the the .cls/.abcl files and always use the .lisp Way easier than my manual way of of testing: (this here is incomplete but you get the idea) mkdir LISPHOME xcopy src\org\*.lisp LISPHOME\org\ /d /e javac -d LISPHOME -sourcepath src\ src\org\armedbear\lisp\*.java src\org\armedbear\lisp\util\*.java javac -cp LISPHOME -d LISPHOME -sourcepath src\ src\org\armedbear\lisp\java\swing\*.java src\org\armedbear\lisp\protocol\*.java javac -cp LISPHOME -d LISPHOME -sourcepath src\ src\org\armedbear\lisp\scripting\*.java java -cp LISPHOME org.armedbear.lisp.Main :cd ../ansi-tests (load "doit.lsp") Which also doesn't preclude re-disabling the compiler, so a command line switch enabling of a boolean is still going to be the smartest choice. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/218#comment:2> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear