![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/bfc2df4941985c6757bb9cc05a33e95f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
#107: (setf (values (struct-slot struct)) (values 42)) fails -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmohamed | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: other | Version: Resolution: worksforme | Keywords: SETF VALUES STRUCT-SLOT -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Changes (by mmohamed): * priority: major => minor * resolution: => worksforme * status: new => closed * component: CLOS => other Comment: I am unable to confirm this. FWIW, I am running trunk ABCL with the patch for the long form of define-method-combination (#66) CL-USER> (in-package #:abcl-bug) #<PACKAGE "ABCL-BUG"> ABCL-BUG> (trigger) #S(MYSTRUCT :SLOT 42) ABCL-BUG> (lisp-implementation-type) "Armed Bear Common Lisp" ABCL-BUG> (lisp-implementation-version) "0.22.0-dev" ABCL-BUG> -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/107#comment:1> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear