#23: RETURN handled differently in interpreted and compiled code ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: component1 | Version: Keywords: | ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Robert Dodier writes: See below for foobar.lisp. Interpreted: (foobar) => HELLO 1 NIL Compiled: (foobar) => HELLO 1 HELLO 2 T I'm no expert on the CL spec so I don't know which is correct. But I think Maxima expects the behavior shown by interpreted code here. Thanks for your attention to this. Robert Dodier PS. $ cat foobar.lisp (defun blurf () nil) (defun foobar () (prog (x y z) (declare (ignore x y z)) ((lambda (a b) (declare (ignore a b)) (format t "HELLO 1~%") (cond ((not (blurf)) (return nil)))) nil nil) (format t "HELLO 2~%") (return t))) -- Ticket URL: <http://127.0.0.1:8000/armedbear/ticket/23> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear