#38: CLOS :metaclass support -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: ehuelsmann Type: defect | Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: 0.20 Component: other | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Changes (by ehuelsmann): * owner: somebody => ehuelsmann * status: new => accepted * milestone: => 0.20 -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/38#comment:1> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear

#38: CLOS :metaclass support -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: ehuelsmann Type: defect | Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: 0.20 Component: other | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Description changed by ehuelsmann: Old description:

Blake McBride reports:

Running the code:

(defclass meta-class1 (standard-class) (cv1 cv2 cv3) (:metaclass standard-class))

(defclass class1 (standard-object) (iv1 iv2 iv3) (:metaclass meta-class1))

The second object returns:

#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS1 {F673CC}>

It should be:

#<META-CLASS1 CLASS1 {F673CC}>

Not only is it reporting the wrong class of class1 but it doesn't work either. I suppose ABCL doesn't support the :metaclass option. It just ignores it. The problem is that without that option ABCL's CLOS is severely limited. Any plans to fix this?

Thanks.

Blake McBride

New description: Blake McBride reports: Running the code: {{{ (defclass meta-class1 (standard-class) (cv1 cv2 cv3) (:metaclass standard-class)) (defclass class1 (standard-object) (iv1 iv2 iv3) (:metaclass meta-class1)) }}} The second object returns: #<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS1 {F673CC}> It should be: #<META-CLASS1 CLASS1 {F673CC}> Not only is it reporting the wrong class of class1 but it doesn't work either. I suppose ABCL doesn't support the :metaclass option. It just ignores it. The problem is that without that option ABCL's CLOS is severely limited. Any plans to fix this? Thanks. Blake McBride -- -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/38#comment:3> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear

#38: CLOS :metaclass support -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: ehuelsmann Type: defect | Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: 0.20 Component: other | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Comment(by ehuelsmann): (In [12530]) Re #38: Make method creation and dispatch possible for classes with non-standard-class metaclasses. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/38#comment:5> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear

#38: CLOS :metaclass support -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: ehuelsmann Type: defect | Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: 0.20 Component: other | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Comment(by ehuelsmann): (In [12576]) Re #38: Merge the METACLASS branch to trunk. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/38#comment:7> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear

#38: CLOS :metaclass support -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: ehuelsmann Type: defect | Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: 0.20 Component: other | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Comment(by ehuelsmann): (In [12582]) Re #38: Make Cells compile with our metaclass support by making a documentation initarg. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/38#comment:9> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear