#76: Slime (swank) fuzzy completion very slow --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: somebody Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: other | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Comment(by ehuelsmann): To reproduce, in ABCL run (inside the slime/ directory): {{{ $ abcl (require 'asdf) (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :swank) (swank-loader::init :load-contribs t) }}} For clisp, run in the same directory, with these commands: {{{ $ clisp (load "swank-loader") (swank-loader::init :load-contribs t) }}} The form to be executed (and hence profiled) is: {{{ (let ((swank::*buffer-package* *package*)) (swank::fuzzy-completions "de" 'cl-user))) }}} Using (TIME ...) on the given form, ABCL returns 0.2 seconds, while clisp returns 0.08 seconds. Clearly, clisp still is a lot faster, but I'd be surprised if ABCL is still "intolerably slow". -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/76#comment:1> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear

#76: Slime (swank) fuzzy completion very slow --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ehuelsmann | Owner: somebody Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: unscheduled Component: other | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: performance --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Changes (by ehuelsmann): * keywords: => performance * milestone: => unscheduled Comment: Unscheduled. Waiting for someone to do more research; the hot-spot list still looks roughly the same. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/76#comment:3> armedbear <http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear> armedbear