On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Raymond Toy toy.raymond@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/12/12 12:37 PM, Faré wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of ASDF 2.22. Since previous release 2.21, the changes are as follow:
Since I didn't see any mention of it, I ran the test with cmucl 2012-06 (the very latest snapshot). All tests pass, so I'll be including asdf 2.22 in the next snapshot.
Oh, excellent.
As usual before release (but unhappily not always - woe to me), I made sure that all our tests pass against all the supported Linux x64 implementations: ccl clisp sbcl ecl cmucl abcl scl allegro lispworks (the complete test suite currently takes almost 2 hours; I haven't tried parallelizing it, though). The CMUCL I used was 2012-04.
I don't remember - did we ever get to the root of the low-level failures we used to have with CMUCL? What was it?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org As the Chinese say, 1001 words is worth more than a picture. — John McCarthy