Dear fellow lispers,
I'd like to release asdf 2.23 around July 14 or so. Can you review the changes so far and test it for stability?
Changes since 2.22: * exported more pathname-related utilities from the package asdf * tweak compile-file* to accept a :compile-check argument, and the :around-compile protocol to allow passing flags to compile-file* This allows for a race-condition-free way of imposing strictures on files that are being compiled, and is used by asdf-finalizers.
Speaking of which, some time ago, I started to collect asdf extensions, and I just added a listing of them on the asdf webpage. Please suggest more extensions that I may list on the page. Currently listed are:
* asdf-contrib, an umbrella that just depends-on other extensions. * asdf-encodings (depends on asdf 2.21), to compile Lisp source files with character encodings other than UTF-8. * asdf-bundle, to bundle one or more systems into a single FASL file, for easier delivery (only on SBCL, CCL and hopefully still ECL, for now). * asdf-condition-control (distributed as part of XCVB), to control which conditions to warn about or to muffle during compilation. * asdf-finalizers, to allow macros, reader-macros or types to include code to be evaluated at the toplevel, at the end of a file being compiled. (I personally think it's very cool.) * asdf-dependency-grovel, to compute the actual dependencies in a big ASDF system (not included by asdf-contrib). * poiu, to compile a system in parallel (not included by asdf-contrib).
I suppose I should list CFFI and IOlib (and possibly SB-GROVEL?), maybe cl-protobufs, xcvb-bridge and more, for notably possessing non-trivial ASDF extensions. Or should I? What other systems should I list?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. — William Pitt, 1783