FWIW, I also think that one-package-per-file is nicer, and better than anything else I have heard. So if my vote counts and we are voting shortly, that is likely what I would go with.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Faré fahree@gmail.com wrote:
fasciculus is nice (small package in latin) But one-package-per-file is nicer. *If* there's going to be a renaming, I'd vote for that, without a -system suffix: asdf/one-package-per-file.lisp (defsystem foo :class :one-package-per-file ...)
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org What is mind? No matter! What is matter? Never mind! — Bertrand Russell's Grand Mother, In Karl Popper, The Unended Quest
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alastair Bridgewater alastair.bridgewater@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I always thought of the style as being one-package-per-file, but I called the build system that I developed around it "quick build" for a completely unrelated reason.
I would suggest not calling it "quick-build", but other than that I'm not sure that I care.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon pjb@informatimago.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 00:00, Faré fahree@gmail.com wrote:
Before the release is the best time for renaming things. If you have a suggestion for a better name, now is the time to speak, not later.
fasciculus
(Since we have alexandria and cesarum, we could go on…)
— __Pascal Bourguignon__
Asdf-devel mailing list Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel