On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Faré fahree@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Ben Hyde bhyde@pobox.com wrote:
My cl-launch scripts can take one second.
I can trim a half second off that with a disk-cache[2] of *source-registry*.
I'm jealous. Your machine is almost 25% faster than mine.
weird, it’s nothing special. I bought something I could hold it open with one hand while hitting staff with the other. http://j.mp/1lfhMwY
[2] A proof of concept disk cache...
The cache should ideally be per source-registry entry; and managed by the same entity that manages said entry. Thus, I was thinking of an optional second form in cl-source-registry.conf file. Or a separate .cl-source-registry.cache file.
I saw that. i’m ambivalent about the complexity.
So, anytime somebody rearranges the set of asdf systems they are expected to invoke reset-quickasdf.
quickasdf horrible name - but it bemused me at the time.
Ouch.
I love achieving my goals.
Calling initialize-source-registry directly from the repl takes
0.47 seconds without the diskcache and .004 seconds with it.
Yes, that's the general thing I'm thinking about: kind of back to the concept of link farms
Any insta-theories for where other half second comes from?
- ben
"Since English is a mess, it maps well onto the problem space, which is also a mess, which we call reality.” - Larry Wall