![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4fd19de0b3e4891247e0056c282337c4.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
28 Oct
2009
28 Oct
'09
1:26 p.m.
Is it a contingent fact about this system that we have an absolute pathname here, o have we somehow ended up with a function named foo-relative-pathname that returns absolute pathnames?
as far as i read it, 'relative' here refers to 'system' in the meaning: give me a pathname that is relative to this system. -- attila