8 Apr
2015
8 Apr
'15
8:57 p.m.
Attila Lendvai wrote:
Usability demands an asdf:build function. The name may vary, but shorter is better. asdf:b or asdf:bnm (build 'n' munge?) might do, too.
these sound awful to me, but then i'm against abbreviations in general and always have fuzzy completion on my TAB...
a perfect candidate for this semantics would be 'operate', but sadly that's already taken.
"Prepare," which would also be a good candidate, is also taken. :-/
"Ready" might be ok. Not great, but OK.
Best, r