"Robert" == Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.net writes:
Robert> On 1/9/16 Jan 9 -3:13 AM, Raymond Toy wrote: >>>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Goldman >>>>>>> rpgoldman@sift.net writes: >> Robert> On 1/7/16 Jan 7 -10:44 PM, Raymond Toy wrote: >> >>>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Goldman >> >>>>>>> rpgoldman@sift.net writes: >> >> Robert> On 1/4/16 Jan 4 -11:48 AM, Raymond Toy wrote: OK, I just Robert> pushed 3.1.6.8 with the fix for you. >> >> >> >> Hmm. I just did a git pull --rebase, but only 3.1.6.6 is >> >> available. >> >> >> >> Am I doing something wrong? >> Robert> I think so. I just did a git pull (not rebase), and I now Robert> have Faré's Robert> 3.1.6.9 on top of my 3.1.6.8. >> >> Ok, AFAICT, I do have the code (from gitlab), and I can see the >> commit where you bumped to version to 3.1.6.8, but there's no >> tag for 3.1.6.8. There's one for 3.1.6.7 and 3.1.6.9 but not >> .8. >> >> I'll use 3.1.6.9 for the next cmucl snapshot. >>
Robert> Sorry; forgot the
Robert> "git push origin 3.1.6.8" that's needed as part of bumping Robert> the revision.
Robert> So the code went, but not the tag.
Yeah, I saw the commit logs.
Robert> It seems wrong to have random tags as the versions used in Robert> implementations. Wonder if I should run the full set of Robert> tests to bless this as 3.1.7. Is there enough time for Robert> that? There have been a reasonable number of bug fixes.
Too late. :-( I tagged the snapshot already. Don't worry. We try to make sure the snapshots work, but don't guarantee it; they have been broken a few times before.
Whenever you make a 3.1.7, I'll be sure to pick it up for the snapshot.
-- Ray