Re: Incremental defsystem dependencies

Dear Stelian, dear Lispers,

[...]

...

Stelian, how sad would you be if you have to segregate defsystem-depends-on to refer to systems in separate files?

Stelian, what do you think?

I would be quite sad, because from my point of view as a user the whole point of the slash-systems was to have all systems in a library in a single file. That said, it's mostly an æsthetic concern, I can live with it.

I suppose this shows one more time the limits of the naively parsing .asd files using CL:EVAL. One can't easily do a two-pass evaluation of the definitions therein.