Would changing (:tree <path>) so it accepts an optional argument be less adhoc?
Possibly (:tree <path> &key (depth nil) (don-not-recure-after-asdf-encountered nil))
That said this would have little if any value in my use case. I point ask it to sweep over my
the directory where all my coding lives, and most of the directories in there are not lisp, and so
there ain’t any asd files in those.
- ben