Re: Working around nonconforming names in system definitions

On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 7:29 PM phoebe Goldman phoebe@goldman-tribe.org wrote:

if you're newly adding system definitions, it seems like you must be at liberty to choose whatever names you want for those systems, right?

Yes, and I might end up there, but I'd rather keep the name of the system the same as the name of the project, because it's going to cause unnecessary confusion to try to ensure that users refer to the "right" name.

Maybe I can encapsulate some heuristics so that nonconforming names get mapped into the corresponding conforming name or names, so that users can refer to the original, nonconforming name ... That's not foolproof, so, again, I'd rather not if I don't have to.

Robert