On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 18:33, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:No. Juanjo will confirm, but
> Question: any objection to modifying your patch so that we have
> something like:
>
> #+ecl
> (defun use-ecl-byte-compiler-p ()
> (member :ecl-bytecomp *features*))
> #-ecl
> (defun use-ecl-byte-compiler-p ()
> nil)
>
> and then call the function in place of the member query in other code?
>
IIUC it can change at runtime after having loaded ASDF, so it's
#+ecl
(defun use-ecl-bytecode-compiler-p ()
(member :ecl-bytecmp *features*))