: Faré I think the code is ready for 3.1.6.
I see one regression: logical pathnames on CLISP, that don't play well with the newly used temporary file strategy. I propose we punt on that test and file a bug against CLISP. Maybe some day CLISP will have new maintainers who'll fix it. Anyone who uses logical pathnames DESERVES to lose.
:Robert That sounds great. Would you mind filing a launchpad bug for this, if there isn't one already, and we can make that the first for 3.1.7....
There'll be no action on my end tomorrow or the next day because of the holiday and a delivery deadline the following day. I'll try to get to releasing after that.
I filed these: https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1498629 https://sourceforge.net/p/clisp/bugs/677/
I will mark the test as a known failure on clisp, if you want. I don't think it should block the release.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org "Diversity is compulsory along those axes we swear don't matter and strictly forbidden in the one domain that matters, ideology."