On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Faré <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:fahree@gmail.com">fahree@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
It may very well be that my recent package manipulations (in hope of<br>
achieving hot upgrade of ASDF) are what broke ASDF on ECL, and not<br>
Robert&#39;s TRAVERSE fixes.<br>

I apologize if that is the case. Can you pull 1.651 and see if it<br>
fixed the issue?<br clear="all"></blockquote></div><br>Sitting behind a firewall, will not be able to pull from git for a few hours. I have a small question though.<br><br>Why not using the scheme<br><br>(defpackage :asdf-boot<br>
 ...)<br>; all new code using asdf-boot package<br>; rename package &quot;asdf&quot; -&gt; &quot;asdf-old&quot;<br>; rename package &quot;asdf-boot&quot; -&gt; &quot;asdf&quot;<br><br>instead of manually moving the symbols around? The difference here is that the symbols that the compiler reads in &quot;all new code&quot; are well defined and are the same ones that will end up being installed in the final &quot;ASDF&quot; package.<br>
<br>Juanjo<br><br>-- <br>Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC<br>c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) <br><a href="http://tream.dreamhosters.com">http://tream.dreamhosters.com</a><br>