Hi

Sorry for the general noise, not necessarily related to the issue at hand.

I know I am a P.I.T.A.,  but I kind of concluded that versions of the kind

    YYYYMMDD

Are better than

    major.minor.small.itsy.bitsy.bit

What do you think?

All the best

Marco






On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 4:16 AM Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
I’m a little unsure of whether the “Committee for Ongoing and Perpetual ASDF maintenance” (hi Robert!) wishes us to include the results of “<file:bin/bump-version>” in submitted patches.

I have a small ABCL-specific patch dealing with UIOP:PARSE-UNIX-NAMESTRING when loading system definitions from zip archives for which I have used bump-version to denote as version “3.3.4.0.1”.  I’ve not quite finished my testing to ensure that previous versions of ABCL work well with it, but when I do, do you wish me to include the use of “bump-version” with the patch or is that something the Committee prefers to do on its own?

yours,
Mark


--
"A screaming comes across the sky.  It has happened before but there is nothing
to compare to it now."








--
Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor         tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01
DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://bimib.disco.unimib.it
Viale Sarca 336
I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY