3 Mar
2013
3 Mar
'13
4:51 p.m.
Dave Cooper <david.cooper@genworks.com> writes:
This is with no (in-package ...) form at the beginning.
In any case, it looks like as long as the .asd files are used as intended, then no package prefix is needed on the (defsystem ...), and no (in-package ...) is needed at the top (when using any ASDF version).
I think the confusion started at a time when we were, for some reason, manually loading .asd files ourselves by calling (load ...), ...
Not for me - I had problems with indentation when using plain (defsystem ...) and no problems with (asdf:defsystem ...), so I always used the latter. Zach