On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.net wrote:
On 6/26/17 Jun 26 -10:07 AM, Faré wrote:
No, you're right that files from :read-file-form and :read-file-line perfectly fit as INPUT-FILES for DEFINE-OP. I haven't given any thought on whether it's easy or hard to properly inject them as results of INPUT-FILES.
NB: I don't have much cycles for ASDF at the moment, but I will gladly review patches or fix urgent bugs.
I'll try to get a patch done sometime this week. I think I should just base the topic branch off the plan branch, right?
PS: What do you think about releasing ASDF 3.3 after next month, just taking steps to avoid escalating from WARNING to STYLE-WARNING until next release?
3.3 being the "plan branch," right? I think it sounds good, as long as my machines can get in some quality time running the test suite ;-)
Yes, you can either use the "plan" branch directly, or start a new branch off of it if you're not too sure.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Without education, we are in a horrible and deadly danger of taking educated people seriously. — G. K. Chesterton