Thanks a lot Anton.
Robert, is there any blocker to release?
Anton, would you have time to run the tests with the deferred-warnings enabled? With :uiop in the use-list of :asdf-user?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Living your life is a task so difficult, it has never been attempted before.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
27.01.2014, 11:04, "Faré" fahree@gmail.com:
Anton: can you run cl-test-grid against that? If you have time, also try with (uiop:enable-deferred-warnings-check) and also try with :uiop in the :use list of :asdf-user.
I have results for ASDF 3.1.0.63 for these lisps:
abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86 ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86 clisp-2.49-unix-x86 cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86 ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86
No regressions found so far.
The report: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-28.html
It compares the ASDF 3.1.0.63 results to the results with original ASDF versions coming with these lisps, on quicklisp 2013-12-13. All the failures we see here were discussed previously, they are not ASDF problems (quicklisp bug + the strange CCL:SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS on CCL when building cl-l10n).
I am running more tests, will follow up here when results are ready.
Best regards,
- Anton