I've mistakenly taken this thread as one on the ecl-devel - please ignore direct ECL references.
Regards, Daniel
Daniel Kochmański writes:
Faré writes:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Daniel Kochmański daniel@turtleware.eu wrote:
Faré writes:
Difficulties making monolithic-lib-op portable suggest that it (and maybe also lib-op) should output an object file as if by ld -r rather than a static library. Indeed, there is no *portable* way to combine several .a files into a single one on a BSD system (including MacOS X). Or should that be the case only on said systems?
We have currently bug regarding combining static libraries[1], but doesn't BSD nor OSX support libtool? If yes, then we can just extract all objects from static archive and combine them again.
[1] https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/issues/177
In one of the comments @Whimse provides a working solution using libtool.Do you require libtool to be installed on BSD (including OSX)? It certainly doesn't come standard, not even on Linux.
It is at least dependency at ECL compilation time (bdwgc requires it). It isn't that unreasonable to require it for C backend.
Also, I could never get libtool to work correctly, even on Linux, despite having alleged cut-and-paste recipes and a man page.
@Whimse claims it works just OK for him. I'll have to adjust it to play nice with cross-compilation framework I'm working on now.
I was thinking about MRI scripts, but they are also a GNUism not supported on BSD.
Why do we need a .a rather than a .o, anyway? For the proposed use case, a .o seems more reasonable.
That's what we do - we combine .o files. But Sometimes we want to combine with already built static libraries. That's when such approach would be necessary. Mentioned bug affects only such situations. If you just do monolithic build from lisp lisp sources then there's not a problem.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Director is a misnomer. You're a hoper. You put all these people together and you hope it all works out. — Frank Oz, director of "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels"