Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info writes:
Got it. So you didn't object to the old level of verbosity?
No, which is why I wrote that I'd be happy if the old behavior was restored.
I'm confused because it seemed like the alternatives were new, greater verbosity, versus silence, neither of which seems very appealing to me.
Those are indeed both bad choices.
I guess the challenge that's specific to ql is that you'd like to be able to throttle verbosity, but the use of invocations of LOAD-SYSTEM inside .asd files (rather than in depends-on) breaks that, right? Is the right answer (horrors! ;->) a dynamically bound verbosity-controller?
Any change that I can ignore, and still get the current appearance, behavior, and semantics, is one I don't mind.
Zach