Also, I'd like to know if any package in Quicklisp relies on some ASDF internals I'd like to rename. This is especially harder when users define methods on a generic function — you can't rename the function, then. Is there an easy way to download EVERYTHING (excluding old versions) so I may grep the results?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. — H.L. Mencken
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Zach Beane xach@xach.com wrote:
Faré fahree@gmail.com writes:
I intend to release 2.27 next week. Can people test on their systems and their implementations?
Xach, are things all clear with Quicklisp now?
There is an unusual issue with the "periods" library that I can't quite puzzle out. It does not have any trouble with ASDF 2.26, but it fails to load from FASL, under some circumstances, with the latest commit to master. It seems like something in my build environment is triggering it, but I can't reproduce it reliably enough to figure it out.
I'll keep you posted.
Do you logs of some of these failures? Maybe I can reproduce at home, or, looking at the .asd and knowing what I changed, figure a scenario that explains the failure.
http://report.quicklisp.org/periods/2012-12-12/failtail.txt is the typical failure log. The use of the SERIES package is conditionalized on the :PERIODS-USE-SERIES feature, and I can't find any place where that is in effect.
Zach