On 4/12/12 Apr 12 -3:51 PM, Faré wrote:
I added a more functional test for logical pathnames, and made a round of fixes for logical pathnames. Some things are still broken on CLISP and Allegro, but I blame the implementations (see test/test-logical-pathname.script for details).
p-cos, janderson, pjb: I believe you are the three known users of logical pathnames. Can you test the latest ASDF in your respective setups? (currently 2.20.10).
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Think you can, or think you can't — either way, you'll be right. — Henry Ford
asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
I ran this on CCL 1.8 on Mac OS X 1.6 and got 10 test failures, which is new
Using /Users/rpg/ccl/dx86cl64 --no-init --quiet --batch Ran 39 tests: 29 passing and 10 failing failing test(s): test-module-depend.script test-module-excessive-depend.script test-redundant-recompile.script test-samedir-modules.script test-source-file-type.script test-static-and-serial.script test-weakly-depends-on-present.script test-weakly-depends-on-unpresent.script test1.script test2.script
Cheers, r