On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Robert Goldman <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info">rpgoldman@sift.info</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">

</div>Isn&#39;t this a job for<br>
<br>
(defmethod output-files asdf:around ((op operation) (c component)<br>
...)<br>
<div><div></div><br></div></blockquote></div>Wrapping around a method that undoes the change that another around method was doing looks definitely like a bad hack to me. Instead, providing an API for a method to advertise that no around method should mess with its output looks like something predictable and which does not lead to double-coding.<br clear="all">
<br>Juanjo<br><br>-- <br>Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC<br>c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) <br><a href="http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com">http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com</a><br>