Faré wrote:
OK, so the main contender seem to be, without -system suffix:
one-package-per-file
Robert, are you alright with that name? Do you insist on the shorter variant package-per-file ?
I can do the renaming this weekend, and update the various relevant libraries.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org "I'm going to live forever, or die trying!" — Spider Robinson
I don't care so much about whether or not one- is there.
But it seems to me that it would be a LOT better if "SYSTEM" appeared somewhere in this name. Even to the point that PPF-SYSTEM would be better than PACKAGE-PER-FILE...
I guess
(DEFSYSTEM foo :CLASS ONE-PACKAGE-PER-FILE )
isn't terrible, but ONE-PACKAGE-PER-FILE doesn't scream "I am a subclass of SYSTEM" to me. Note for comparison that all of our file subtypes have -FILE (like STATIC-FILE, JAVA-FILE, etc.). That seems like a good convention.
Cheers, r