![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d6b1f89356fe5d22edd50fb21bf7fa6d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
30 Apr
2014
30 Apr
'14
1 p.m.
21.04.2014, 03:44, "Faré" <fare@tunes.org>:
If you have time, please also run the latest from the syntax-control branch,
Tested on quicklisp 2014-04-25 and abcl-1.2.1-fasl42-linux-x86 abcl-1.3.1-rc-2-svn-14695-fasl42-linux-x86 ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86 clisp-2.49-unix-x86 cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86 ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86 sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86 No regressions comparing to the ASDF versions originally shipped with those lisps: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-42.html Best regards, - Anton