Jean-Claude Beaudoin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:
This morning I pulled an update from the mkcl git repo, rebuilt on my Linux Mint machine, and retested with the latest ASDF. All the tests that completed seemed to complete successfully, but test-program.script hung, instead of completing. ... The block of the test that fails is "test program-op", "test image-op" seems to complete successfully. This seems odd to me, since the result of the image test is a standalone program: it doesn't need to be loaded into mkcl: ... So seems like the program-op should be able to do exactly what the image-op does, and work correctly.I just tried to have as clean a run at it as I can reasonably have it. So, from a freshly created directory, I did:
git clone git://common-lisp.net/projects/mkcl/mkcl.git http://common-lisp.net/projects/mkcl/mkcl.git
then built it with: (cd mkcl; configure; cd src; make install-local)
Hm. I did a slightly different set of steps:
cd mkcl ./configure make sudo make install
but these look like they should be equivalent (since I didn't set MKCL).
Followed by:
git clone git://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/asdf.git http://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/asdf.git
cd asdf; make t l=mkcl
This resulted in:
-#--------------------------------------- Using /home/jean-claude/tmp/ASDF/mkcl/src/bin/mkcl Ran 56 tests: 55 passing and 1 failing failing test(s): test-undeferred-warnings.script -#---------------------------------------
To view full results and failures, try the following command: less -p ABORTED build/results/mkcl-test.text make: *** [test-lisp] Error 1 jean-claude@mars>
The last line just here above is my normal prompt, so no hang. As you see I do not reproduce the problem you mentioned.
BTW, what happens in test-undeferred-warnings seems to be a syntax issue but I am still unclear about it.
What happens here is that there is a function with undeclared local variables, but ASDF is not getting a warning from COMPILE-FILE, so it mistakenly believes the build is successful.
I don't think I wrote this test properly, though. In a message crossing with this one, Faré has limited its applicability, but I'm not sure I understand the change. Surely that system should not build successfully?
Cheers, r