Weird.
On my Mac, it's http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/test-results.html
SBCL passes all; the others only fail on one.
I'll check it out.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Faré wrote:
I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp. Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem related to the pathname redirection of ABL / CLC. test1.script test2.script test3.script test-force.script test-static-and-serial.script
On CLISP, the two additional failures are test-module-pathnames.script where clisp reads "foo.cl" as having directory nil instead of (:relative), which I think is legal, and test-retry-loading-component-1.script which seems to have to do with a restart-case retry in do-one-dep, but that's beyond my depth.
The good news is most of these failures are only failures of the test themselves. The bad news is someone probably has to fix them and commit a fix.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Intentions are not so much direct descriptions of actual mind processes as Schelling points in the way social animals communicate.
asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
-- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter