Faré <fahree@gmail.com> writes:
Oh shit, that's right: it uses version-satisfies instead of version<= (which didn't exist at the time), and of course, 3.0.0 doesn't satisfy 2.26 because of the major version mismatch. Ouch.
One solution would be that quicklisp be patched to accept asdf if #+asdf3 or (member :asdf3 *features*). Another solution that quicklisp itself be updated to use asdf3 and possibly version<= rather than version-satisfies, or not: I've added a minor version number that allows to have version "branches" that don't involve a new major version number.
The last solution would be that ASDF be stuck forever in using 2 as its major version number. Maybe I should have done just that, because that's the only 100% backward compatible way. Then I should promptly rename ASDF 3.0.0 into ASDF 2.34.0 or some such.
I don't like any of these solutions, and I feel stupid for not thinking about it earlier.
Xach, any comment?
What about making version-satisfies return t? Zach