Re: [asdf-devel] Patch to asdf:run-shell-command

Quick follow up to the last patch. Commparing the definitions for ACL and SBCL, I'm wondering if the ACL version is guaranteed to do what is desired. In particular, I see that the SBCL version is careful to get a Bourne-compatible shell, per the docstring. But the ACL string doesn't say anything about how the shell is chosen. For example, as an unreconstructed old guy, I use the tcsh. If I was to run this under ACL, would I get tcsh behavior instead of what the docstring dictates?

I've never run into trouble, because I've never done anything that really uses the shell in excl:run-shell-command.

Best, r