On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
On 9/17/11 Sep 17 -1:47 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote: ecl-bytecomp : first compile and load asdf, then call INSTALL-BYTECODES-COMPILER, then run the tests.
ecl : first (require :CMP), then compile and load asdf, then runtests.
Question: does this recipe FORCE us to have the right compiler forthe
tests?I do not fully understand the last question. What is "the right compiler". There are simply two, which may be used interchangably without problems -- otherwise to be reported as an error.
What I want to do is to be able to set up two versions of the ASDF test cases for ECL, one for ECL with the byte-compiler and one with it's normal compiler.
Yes, the protocol above would achieve that. The only thing is that the bytecodes compiler is not always present in ECL (someone may choose to deactivate it) and it is only a recent development, not available in the latest stable release -- I should make one soon.
A way to check for it is to see whether INSTALL-BYTECODES-COMPILER is fboundp.
Juanjo