Re: [asdf-devel] patch for component-relative-pathname

...

why is this better than to leave names atomic and provide a standard syntax to parse component relative (sic) pathnames?

Note that my whole last email is a red herring wrt this question.  My last email assumes that Fare's change stays in, and I'm trying to write it up in the documentation.

I.e., "let's you and him fight."  I am bowing out of this discussion.

I don't understand the question and the proposed alternatives, so I can't argue an answer.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] If you waste time explaining why a socialist's welfare plan will fail, it didn't: it successfully diverted your attention from a Power Grab.