Is this system somewhere available (e.g., GitHub) so we could try to replicate?

For that matter, could we break on signals and get a backtrace?

thanks,
r


On 18 Oct 2017, at 8:25, Chream iz wrote:

Hi, I am also getting this error when trying to run (asdf:test-system ....). It is also not finding the test-files but that might be an but in the prove package?

Summary:
  All 0 files passed.
WARNING:
   Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action (ASDF/LISP-ACTION:TEST-OP
                                                     "iparse"), but dependency (ASDF/LISP-ACTION:TEST-OP
                                                                                "iparse-test") wasn't done yet!


system asd:

#|
  This file is a part of iparse project.
  Copyright (c) 2017 Christopher Eames (chream) (chream@gmx.com)
|#

#|
  Author: Christopher Eames (chream) (chream@gmx.com)
|#

(in-package :cl-user)
(defpackage iparse-asd
  (:use :cl :asdf))
(in-package :iparse-asd)

(defsystem iparse
  :version "0.1.1"
  :class :package-inferred-system
  :author "Christopher Eames (chream)"
  :license "MIT"
  :depends-on ("iparse/src/iparse")
  :description "A small parsing and data structure library."
  :long-description
  #.(with-open-file (stream (merge-pathnames
                             #p"README.markdown"
                             (or *load-pathname* *compile-file-pathname*))
                            :if-does-not-exist nil
                            :direction :input)
      (when stream
        (let ((seq (make-array (file-length stream)
                               :element-type 'character
                               :fill-pointer t)))
          (setf (fill-pointer seq) (read-sequence seq stream))
          seq)))
  :in-order-to ((test-op (test-op iparse-test))))

(register-system-packages
 "closer-mop"
 '(:c2mop :closer-common-lisp :c2cl :closer-common-lisp-user :c2cl-user))
(register-system-packages
 "lil"
 '(:lil/core :interface :pure :smltateful :classy :posh :lil/test))

(register-system-packages "iparse/src/all" '(:iparse.dev))
(register-system-packages "iparse/src/formats" '(:iparse.formats))
(register-system-packages "iparse/src/utils" '(:iparse.utils))
(register-system-packages "iparse/src/iparse" '(:iparse))
(register-system-packages "iparse/src/types" '(:iparse.types))



Test system asd:

#|
  This file is a part of iparse project.
  Copyright (c) 2017 Christopher Eames (chream) (chream@gmx.com)
|#

(in-package :cl-user)
(defpackage iparse-test-asd
  (:use :cl :asdf))
(in-package :iparse-test-asd)

(defsystem iparse-test
  :author "Christopher Eames (chream)"
  :license ""
  :depends-on (:iparse
               :prove)
  :components ((:module "t"
                :serial t
                :components
                ((:file "utils")
                 (:test-file "utils-test")
                 (:test-file "read-single-test-byte")
                 (:test-file "read-single-test-sequence")
                 (:test-file "read-single-test-composite")
                 (:test-file "read-single-test-class")
                 (:test-file "byte")
                 (:test-file "macro")
                 (:module "new"
                  :serial t
                  :components
                  ((:test-file "basic-tests"))))))
  :description "Test system for iparse"

  :defsystem-depends-on (:prove-asdf)
  :perform (test-op :after (op c)
                    (funcall (intern #.(string :run-test-system) :prove-asdf) c)
                    (asdf:clear-system c)))


Christopher




On 18 Oct 2017, at 15:05, Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:

Can you anonymize it and send it? Or extract a minimal failure case? I
can't reproduce at home, nor imagine what could be happening.

Anton, could you test the syntax-control branch with cl-test-grid, and
grep the results for expansions of the format string "Computing
just-done stamp in plan ~S for action ~S, but dependency ~S wasn't
done yet!" ?

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Mathematics is as little a science as grammar is a language. — Ernst Mayr


On Wed, Oct 18, 2017, 08:11 Stas Boukarev <stassats@gmail.com> wrote:

It's a work file, can't publish it. But it's just a defsystem with depends-on and components.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:46 PM Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:

It's hard to tell without seeing the .asd file. The message says that
you completed the load-op of the system, but somehow you never did the
define-op of the system (the new action that tracks the loading of
.asd files so that defsystem-depends-on can be properly staged).

Can you tell us more about the "non-complicated" features that you
use? Do you follow the "best practices" document?
https://github.com/fare/asdf/blob/master/doc/best_practices.md

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Don't forget your daily prayer to Baah-kup,
the God of data storage and recovery!



On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats@gmail.com> wrote:
More new warnings from ASDF 3.3, this time I have no idea what it means.

WARNING:
  Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action
(ASDF/LISP-ACTION:LOAD-OP
                                                    "system"), but
dependency (ASDF/FIND-SYSTEM:DEFINE-OP

"system") wasn't done yet!

The .asd file is not public, but it looks perfectly normal without using any
complicated features.