Is this system somewhere available (e.g., GitHub) so we could try to replicate?
For that matter, could we break on signals and get a backtrace?
thanks,
r
On 18 Oct 2017, at 8:25, Chream iz wrote:
Hi, I am also getting this error when trying to run (asdf:test-system ....). It is also not finding the test-files but that might be an but in the prove package?Summary:All 0 files passed.WARNING:Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action (ASDF/LISP-ACTION:TEST-OP"iparse"), but dependency (ASDF/LISP-ACTION:TEST-OP"iparse-test") wasn't done yet!system asd:#|This file is a part of iparse project.Copyright (c) 2017 Christopher Eames (chream) (chream@gmx.com)|##|Author: Christopher Eames (chream) (chream@gmx.com)|#(in-package :cl-user)(defpackage iparse-asd(:use :cl :asdf))(in-package :iparse-asd)(defsystem iparse:version "0.1.1":class :package-inferred-system:author "Christopher Eames (chream)":license "MIT":depends-on ("iparse/src/iparse"):description "A small parsing and data structure library.":long-description#.(with-open-file (stream (merge-pathnames#p"README.markdown"(or *load-pathname* *compile-file-pathname*)):if-does-not-exist nil:direction :input)(when stream(let ((seq (make-array (file-length stream):element-type 'character:fill-pointer t)))(setf (fill-pointer seq) (read-sequence seq stream))seq))):in-order-to ((test-op (test-op iparse-test))))(register-system-packages"closer-mop"'(:c2mop :closer-common-lisp :c2cl :closer-common-lisp-user :c2cl-user))(register-system-packages"lil"'(:lil/core :interface :pure :smltateful :classy :posh :lil/test))(register-system-packages "iparse/src/all" '(:iparse.dev))(register-system-packages "iparse/src/formats" '(:iparse.formats))(register-system-packages "iparse/src/utils" '(:iparse.utils))(register-system-packages "iparse/src/iparse" '(:iparse))(register-system-packages "iparse/src/types" '(:iparse.types))Test system asd:#|This file is a part of iparse project.Copyright (c) 2017 Christopher Eames (chream) (chream@gmx.com)|#(in-package :cl-user)(defpackage iparse-test-asd(:use :cl :asdf))(in-package :iparse-test-asd)(defsystem iparse-test:author "Christopher Eames (chream)":license "":depends-on (:iparse:prove):components ((:module "t":serial t:components((:file "utils")(:test-file "utils-test")(:test-file "read-single-test-byte")(:test-file "read-single-test-sequence")(:test-file "read-single-test-composite")(:test-file "read-single-test-class")(:test-file "byte")(:test-file "macro")(:module "new":serial t:components((:test-file "basic-tests")))))):description "Test system for iparse":defsystem-depends-on (:prove-asdf):perform (test-op :after (op c)(funcall (intern #.(string :run-test-system) :prove-asdf) c)(asdf:clear-system c)))ChristopherOn 18 Oct 2017, at 15:05, Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:Can you anonymize it and send it? Or extract a minimal failure case? I
can't reproduce at home, nor imagine what could be happening.
Anton, could you test the syntax-control branch with cl-test-grid, and
grep the results for expansions of the format string "Computing
just-done stamp in plan ~S for action ~S, but dependency ~S wasn't
done yet!" ?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Mathematics is as little a science as grammar is a language. — Ernst Mayr
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017, 08:11 Stas Boukarev <stassats@gmail.com> wrote:
It's a work file, can't publish it. But it's just a defsystem with depends-on and components.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:46 PM Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:
It's hard to tell without seeing the .asd file. The message says that
you completed the load-op of the system, but somehow you never did the
define-op of the system (the new action that tracks the loading of
.asd files so that defsystem-depends-on can be properly staged).
Can you tell us more about the "non-complicated" features that you
use? Do you follow the "best practices" document?
https://github.com/fare/asdf/blob/master/doc/best_practices.md
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Don't forget your daily prayer to Baah-kup,
the God of data storage and recovery!
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats@gmail.com> wrote:More new warnings from ASDF 3.3, this time I have no idea what it means.
WARNING:
Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action
(ASDF/LISP-ACTION:LOAD-OP
"system"), but
dependency (ASDF/FIND-SYSTEM:DEFINE-OP
"system") wasn't done yet!
The .asd file is not public, but it looks perfectly normal without using any
complicated features.