most everything now has equivalent results.[1] abcl now loads asdf, but the test fails anomalously. looking...
abcl fails in connection with a make-pathname operation of the sort
(make-pathname :directory '(:relative) :name "file" :type :unspecific :host nil :device nil)
which i suspect is the first component relative pathname from the first file component in the first system definition, and i've not (yet) understood how handler-bind is intended to behave with abcl, so that pretty much aborts the tests.
i also can't say much about the context, as the stack trace is opaque.
anyway...
abcl has a distinct dislike for :unspecific pathname components.
if the 1.636 code for merge-pathnames* is patched for abcl to always use #'ununspecific, abcl constructs all systems and succeeds with the same 1280/2080 directory/file matches as most of the other implementations.
--- [1] : http://ec2-204-236-204-89.compute-1.amazonaws.com/test/ 20100315T221624/
On 2010-03-15, at 22:53 , Faré wrote:
I tagged ASDF 1.636.
- Can some ABCL user try it? It doesn't have asdf-method-combination
and magic asdf:around anymore.
- James Anderson, can you re-test it, particularly with allegro?
- Juanjo, does it satisfy you wrt output-files protocol?
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http:// fare.tunes.org ] The only way to have a friend is to be one. — Ralph Waldo Emerson
asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel